About Us | Game Reviews | Feature Articles | Podcast | Best Work | Forums | Shop | Review Game

Alpha Protocol Review

Sparky Clarkson's picture

Lost in this Masquerade

Alpha Protocol Screenshot

HIGH Steven "Don't call me Steve" Heck.

LOW The '80s-themed boss fight against a knife-wielding cokehead who somehow is still talking after taking ten bullets in the face.

WTF Let me get this straight: a brilliant intelligence analyst lost track of his own daughter because she took her mother's maiden name?

The allure of role-playing a spy is almost undeniable. Suave and sharply dressed no matter the occasion, James Bond has been a hero to generations, aided by memorable villains with absurd plots for world domination. More recently, new-age spies like the relentless Jack Bauer or hyper-competent Jason Bourne have stolen the show, replacing wit and verve with martial arts and gunplay. It would be a thrill to imagine yourself as any one of these men. It is, however, somewhat less intriguing to contemplate the possibility of being all three at once. Yet, this seems to be Obsidian's aim in their espionage role-playing game Alpha Protocol, and they pursue this wrong-headed goal with a singular lack of competence.

In principle, the idea of a game where you can play as any kind of spy has a certain kind of attraction. The problem is that no story can be made by just one character: the plot, as well as his antagonists and allies, must support the main character. A Bond villain like Oddjob (or even a more grounded one like Le Chiffre) cannot be transplanted into an episode of 24; the result would be by turns laughable and disastrous. The internecine conflict between dour and abusive CIA agents, characteristic of the Bourne movies, would similarly feel completely inappropriate with James Bond in the starring role.

Alpha Protocol attempts to resolve this problem by throwing a little of everything into the plot, creating a grand wreck of a cast and story that manages to feel appropriate to the character being played less than a third of the time. What is the "professional" spy to make of '80s obsessed Konstantin Brayko? How does a "suave" spy fit into a world that holds the startlingly incompetent Omen Deng? The game's threadbare plot is pedestrian in its ideas and sloppy in its execution, but with enough effort these problems can be fixed. There is no level of effort that can address the more fundamental issue, however. No matter what sort of person the player chooses to make the main character Mike Thorton be, he will spend most of the game as an alien, a character who simply does not belong in the world he inhabits.

Alpha Protocol Screenshot

Even the process of constructing this persona has nothing to recommend it. Thorton's dialogue is eternally charmless, even when he is attempting to be suave. If his conversational ineptitude offends his interlocutors, there's no way to know it: their faces barely move. The dialogue sections of the game play out like a world where everyone is wearing a rubber mask. If the game didn't constantly indicate how my choices had affected other characters' opinions, there's no way I could assess them.

Of course, you spend comparatively little time actually talking. Most of the game's duration is bound up in action missions, where Thorton is even more plodding and useless than he is in conversation. I don't expect every videogame spy to rival Sam Fisher in acrobatic ability, but Thorton makes me look like an Olympic gymnast. At least I can climb through scaffolding or step over a k-rail. Thorton can only jump up or drop down at special action points; naturally these are always located at places that are convenient for the developers, even if they look no different from other spots. If a container is sitting on a flat surface I should be able to jump down from it anywhere, not just on the side that's facing a patrol.

Once Thorton is seen by that patrol, the combat system creaks into action. Gunplay is entirely unsatisfying; the perfectly steady reticule seemingly has no relationship with the destination of your bullets. Nor do the opposing AIs give the impression of solid work. Alpha Protocol's grunts have two tricks: lay back and hurl endless grenades (with pinpoint accuracy) or run up and try to punch Thorton. Yes, even if he's got a gun. Yes, even if they've got guns.

Lest you think that the poor construction of the AI is isolated in some way, allow me to assure you that this terrible execution infects every single level of the game, from the useless map and archaic save system right down to the constant pop-in (and pop-out!) of textures. Palm fronds clip through walls, and shadows on one floor bleed through to the ceiling of the floor below. Sometimes the game fails to realize you've reached an objective. Other times it won't let you interact with an action point. Even the plot leaves half a dozen threads dangling, as if nobody could be bothered to finish it. Perhaps they got distracted by shoehorning in all the double- and triple- crosses. When Thorton starts walking in some random direction under his own initiative, I understand why: he's trying to get out of this game.

I could go on like this for quite a while, if I thought it necessary. Alpha Protocol fails on multiple levels, from its completely inappropriate boss fights down to its absurd Looney Toons-style stealth creep. Nothing about this game suggests its makers have any acquaintance with sound design principles or even quality control. Flawed in its conception, impoverished in its design, and thoroughly inept in its execution, Alpha Protocol is an unmitigated disaster. Rating: 1.0 out of 10.

Disclosures: This game was obtained via retail store and reviewed on the Xbox 360. Approximately 30 hours of play was devoted to single-player modes (completed 1 time).

Parents: According to the ESRB, this game contains blood, drug references, intense violence, sexual content, and strong language. The sex is very much PG fade-to-black stuff that shouldn't offend anyone who is generally aware that men and women sometimes sleep together. The violence is standard shooter stuff.

Deaf & Hard of Hearing: The conversations are subtitled and most of this text is clear and easy to read. All audio cues are supplemented by visual ones. With the occasional exception of trying to find an alarm box, deaf players should not be at a serious disadvantage.

Category Tags
Platform(s): Xbox 360   PS3   PC  
Developer(s): Obsidian  
Key Creator(s): Chris Avellone  
Publisher: Sega  
Series: Alpha Protocol  
Genre(s): Role-Playing   Stealth  
ESRB Rating: Mature (17+)  
Articles: Game Reviews  

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It's really that bad? I hear it's quite underrated.

A lot of avid RPG fans compare it to Mass Effect 2, claiming that Alpha Protocol is superior and it's a true RPG unlike Mass Effect 2. Many of them say that the reason the gunplay for the pistols and SMGs is inaccurate, is because the players have invested enough skill sets to their weapon abilities.

Are any of this true? I'm not exactly sure, because I haven't played either of them.

Is it an RPG?

Well, your point man for the Mass Effect 2 / Alpha Protocol comparison has to be Brad, since he's played both. I will say that Alpha Protocol does have a solid RPG feel in many respects, but the satisfaction of skill progression is very heavily dependent on the line you're putting points into. Adding levels in stealth and pistols really made me feel like I was advancing, while adding points to sabotage or assault weapons was more like treading water. Obviously, this will be affected by the way you play the game.

Certainly the reason for the disparity between reticule and bullet destination is low skill level in the relevant weapon. My problem is that this is a really unsatisfying representation, and one of the many ways that this game's RPG elements just don't fit in comfortably with the 3rd-person shooter/adventure parts. Granted, this is a complaint that can be leveled at Mass Effect as well.

This is seems to be "the"

This is seems to be "the" game that professional video game writers are all playing right now. Game releases are slow enough right now, that everyone is playing the same games, as they trickle out. [Final Fantasy, then Red Dead, now this]

I am hearing from SOOO many people that are playing Alpha Protocol right now. And many of them are saying REALLY REALLY positive things about it, as a deep RPG. But it just sounds like a broken mess to me.

If you looked at the

If you looked at the non-gameplay sections, I can easily see people making a comparison between Mass Effect and Alpha Protocol. They're very similar in certain ways, and I like them both. However, the fact is that AP is a shuddering mess when it comes to gameplay, and a game that only gets part of its formula right can’t really be called a good game.

As a matter of fact, I actually stopped playing my first AP game right in the middle (playing as a standard soldier) because it was just too broken and unpleasant. I started a brand-new character and focused only on stealth, and the experience is definitely better, but that's not to say that it's good.

Like Sparky said, the RPG parts don't mesh very well with the Action parts… the developers’ way of representing certain things is counterintuitive at best, and totally illogical a lot of the time. I mean, I understand that showing a skills progression in something like "stealth" may be hard to do in a tangible, noticeable way, but the way that AP does it is just flat-out wrong. For example, the stealth skills end up feeling more like magical powers than something a real secret agent would be able to do. I don't know about you, but having my character be literally invisible doesn't make much sense in a game that's ostensibly about a fairly realistic attempt at depicting espionage action.

Much of the game’s basics are just awful as well. Level design is backwards and seems as though developers had no sense at all about how to allow the player to play in a stealthy manner. Avoiding patrols is one thing, but how are you supposed to be stealthy when you open the door and there’s a guard staring right at you as soon as you open it? Ah yes… the magical “you can’t see me” spy powers.

There are dozens of examples where the game trips up and makes mistakes that should have been ironed out last generation, and because of those things, I really can't recommend AP to anyone. That said, there are certainly parts of it that I thought were enjoyable and it's really a shame that the game feels so broken and unfinished, especially in comparison to the quality of software that's been coming out lately. There's just no room at the table for something as sub-par as this.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Code of Conduct

Comments are subject to approval/deletion based on the following criteria:
1) Treat all users with respect.
2) Post with an open-mind.
3) Do not insult and/or harass users.
4) Do not incite flame wars.
5) Do not troll and/or feed the trolls.
6) No excessive whining and/or complaining.

Please report any offensive posts here.

For more video game discussion with the our online community, become a member of our forum.

Our Game Review Philosophy and Ratings Explanations.

About Us | Privacy Policy | Review Game | Contact Us | Twitter | Facebook |  RSS
Copyright 1999–2016 GameCritics.com. All rights reserved.