Scott Pilgrim vs The World Image

Normally my opinions on film don't go for longer than a paragraph or so. It's not that I don't care, as I can talk about movies for hours if given the opportunity. When it comes to actually sitting down and writing about them however, the words usually just aren't there. Then I watched Scott Pilgrim vs The World.

People who know me would probably think I'd love this movie. And if you were talking to my 18-year-old self, they'd probably be right. It's chock full of gaming references, campy action sequences, girls with blue hair, lots of stuff that the old me would have probably eaten up. That Richard is gone now though. Well, except for the blue hair thing. That's hot.

I expect some depth from my stories now, something on screen to stir an emotional reaction in me. Scott Pilgrim has none of that, even though it's supposedly composed of things that I love. Instead I saw wholly unlikable characters and a thin, unbelievable romance designed to rope people like 18-year-old Richard into thinking it's good.

Scott

Scott is the single biggest problem with the whole movie. Not only is Scott an unlikable douche throughout almost the whole film, Michael Cera's performance exemplifies his bad traits to the point where they're excruciating to watch. I don't hate Cera as much as some people I know, as his jittery teenager character works in a lot of instances (Arrested Development, Superbad, etc.), but here he's disastrously cast as a hero.

Making a character flawed or less than moral is fine-in fact it's great. But there's a big difference between being a lovable buffoon and a desperate jackass. Scott begins the movie dating a high school girl named Knives (who I'll talk about in more detail later) for the sole reason of getting over is previous girlfriend. Knives really cares about Scott, but it's clear that Scott is only using her as a trophy. So we establish at the very beginning that Scott is an insecure jerk, something that never truly changes.

Contrast this with a character like Jack Sparrow. Sure he's kind of an ass himself, and he's motivated by selfishness more often than not. He has actual redeeming qualities though. He's funny, and despite being a thieving pirate he's still likable because his gregariousness overshadows everything else. Scott has none of these things. Instead of being what most teenage/early 20s guys want to be, he's what they are.

The loser persona is never really alleviated, even after the final battle. He's still an annoying whelp even after he supposedly saves the day, and Cera's presence only makes it worse. I need to be able to relate to Scott, but almost everything he does is so cowardly and reprehensible that it's just impossible. He utterly fails as a main character.

Scott Pilgrim vs The World Image

Ramona

Ramona is the girl of Scott's dreams. Or so we're told. It's hard for me to tell since she spends most of the movie looking completely disinterested in everything around her, including Scott. I understand that her character is supposed to be somewhat cold and distant as a result of her past, but she never really comes out of her shell. Instead she's just a stone-faced, blue-haired sex object for Scott to pursue.

We're also never really given any sort of detailed information as to why she is the way she is. There are the animated snippets of her past with the evil exes and her cheap explanation of her infatuation with Gideon, but even then she still appears to be the same emotionless doll, only there to serve as angst material for the exes. This isn't a strong enough character to carry a lead role no matter how much ass she might kick.

Scott Pilgrim vs The World Image

Scott + Ramona = Loveless Romance

As a result of the things I list above, the relationship between Scott and Ramona is a load of crap. First, it's never really clear what Ramona sees in Scott. He clumsily hits on her and then concocts some strange scheme to get her to deliver something to his house. Despite all this, she goes from "go away" to "let's have sex right now" in a very short amount of time for no apparent reason. What is Scott doing that suddenly makes him so attractive?

On that note, I don't get why Ramona is so worth fighting for. She never returns Scott's affection in any meaningful way, so the only thing Scott can be fighting all the evil exes for is the chance to finally have sex with her. Even when it looks like Scott is about to be murdered she still doesn't seem to really care. Sex certainly can be a powerful motivating factor, but sex alone isn't interesting enough in the context of a story unless we're talking about a porno. Hell, this whole movie would've probably worked better as a porno.

Relationships are undoubtedly complex, consisting of lots of thoughts and feelings that don't always make sense. Sometimes it is possible to love someone (or think that you love someone) for no real reason at all. I'm not saying these things never happen. Nor am I saying that all romances need to be deep and meaningful—not every movie needs to be Lost In Translation. However, I need to understand the attraction between the two characters involved to at least a small extent. Seeing them grow on each other bit by bit over the course of the story makes the relationship believable. It's especially important when only a limited amount of time is devoted to said relationship. None of these things are in Scott Pilgrim, and the movie suffers terribly for it.

You earned the power of self-respect… I think

Scott's climactic moment of epiphany is supposed to be when he finally learns that he isn't fighting just for Ramona, but for himself. But let's step back for a second here. The first sword (the red one) is supposed to represent love, which Scott is finally ready to admit. Again, I don't know why Scott loves Ramona. She's never given any indication that she loves him back or that she even cares about him at all outside of a mild physical attraction.

Then there's the second sword that represents self-respect (the blue one), which Scott gets after he admits that he's fighting for himself and not Ramona. But let's step back for another second here. If Scott is acknowledging that he needs to be content with himself before pursuing Ramona, why is he still willing to fight for a loveless relationship? Outside of Ramona, what is his "beef" with Gideon? Wouldn't the self-respecting thing be to just walk away and not put himself through all of this for someone he doesn't really know that well? Someone does indeed learn self-respect in this movie, but it isn't Scott. Or Ramona. It's Knives.

Scott Pilgrim vs The World Image

Knives is the best thing in the movie

OK, there's probably a credible case to be made that Wallace (a great job by Kieran Culkin) is the best thing in the movie, but he's more of a comic relief provider than anything else. Knives on the other hand is the only person that seems to grow up in a movie that is supposedly about growing up.

At the beginning she's young and enthusiastic, tremendously excited to have her first boyfriend. She clearly has really strong feelings for Scott. Then Scott dumps her so he can chase after a doll, and we see her despair as she gets her heart broken for the first time. She then goes through the expected range of emotion that comes from such an event, going from sadness to jealousy and eventually to anger. She becomes a total badass on her own and tries to avenge herself—she has real motivation to use all those cool video game powers…or so she thinks.

See, at the end she's the one that has the epiphany and not Scott. She realizes that she doesn't need Scott to be happy and that he isn't worth obsessing over. That's called maturing. That's what Scott and Ramona are seemingly doing but actually aren't. Instead they're the same uninteresting hipster jerks we met two hours ago. Knives' arc isn't perfect by any means, as it's obscured by all the other crap going on, but it's the only actual character growth in the whole damn movie. In a world of shallow douchebags she is the one person I could actually relate to, and even root for.

Scott Pilgrim vs The World Image

Yes, this is a videogame movie, I get it

Scott Pilgrim's association with gaming (outside of the actual game of course) is apparent from the start. It's also woven in with all the subtlety of the t-shirt section at your local Hot Topic. The constant in-your-face game references come off as something that's absolutely desperate for geek cred rather than an homage to anyone's childhood. I'm guessing this is meant to cover up the fact that there isn't much of a story to tell here, which is a shame because the movie actually does a really good job of dressing everything up.

The idea of Scott Pilgrim is great. It's original and it's got loads of potential for fun action and characters. It's an extremely visually impressive film, which is saying something in an age where flashy effects are commonplace. I think Edgar Wright did a great job outside of the script. I loved Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz, and the style from those films fits here. Scott Pilgrim tries to gloss over script deficiencies with pretty visual effects and slick cinematography, but at least it's good at that.

I really wanted to like this movie. Just because 18-year-old Richard is gone doesn't mean I don't remember him, so the idea of real people interacting in a game world is appealing to me. However, I just can't look past something this shallow anymore. Instead of being a story about growing up, Scott Pilgrim is a reminder that I've grown up.


Richard Naik

Richard Naik

Born and raised in St. Louis, MO, Richard received his first console (the NES) at the age of six, and from that point on games have been an integral part of his life, whether it's been frittering summers away with the likes of Mario, Mega Man, and the Zerg or partaking in marathon sessions of Halo, Team Fortress 2 or Left 4 Dead. After being a longtime reader of GameCritics, Richard joined the staff in March of 2009, and over the years Richard grew into the more prominent role of part-time podcast host.

In 2016, he spearheaded a complete rebuild of the GameCritics.com website, earning him the title of Chief Engineer.

His gaming interests are fairly eclectic, ranging from 2D platformers to old-school-style adventure games to RPGs to first-person shooters. So in other words, he’ll play pretty much anything.
Richard Naik

Leave a Reply

17 Comments on "Why Scott Pilgrim vs The World is a bad movie"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest
Anonymous
Guest
So this movie is no worse than other remake and/or mediocre movies? Actually, I agree with that, but that said, this movie is fan-service that doesn’t even do that well. The characters are wooden as hell, the story tips its hand early and feels tedious, the love interest has next to no personality (she’s just cool), and the main character really isn’t likeable in any way. I appreciate the action sequences and the game references, but the whole film begs the question “Why?” that never seems to leave the forefront of my mind. Granted, maybe I wanted too much for… Read more »
saint
Guest
The original film script had Scott end up with Knives, which would have made more sense according to how the movie played out (Knives helping Scott fight and all…). But the comic had him end up with Ramona (where it was Ramona who helped Scott fight Gideon PLUS so much more that she did). I guess the film writers did not want to completely change the story and earn hatred from fan-boys. Annyway since the film initially wanted to have Knives win Scott but changed their mind at the last minute, you are left with such disappointment as to How… Read more »
Codysseus
Guest

I stumbled across this blog, which had a tremendous discussion on the Scott Pilgrim movie. The original post is well thought out and the comments contribute greatly. Checker out.

http://wrongquestions.blogspot.com/2010/08/scott-pilgrim-vs-world.html

V. Melloy
Guest
Perhaps it would be critical to have likable people in a basic “guy fights to save girl” story – although im not sure; I could image a very interesting storys aside this and im pretty sure something like that exists. But in the case of Scott Pilgrim I’m pretty positive to say, the movie dont wanna be a “guy fights to save girl” story. Sure, perhaps it appears at the suface like that, cause the plot cites this typical constellation between a male and female main-character, but actually it works on another level. And this is hard to miss, cause… Read more »
Richard Naik
Guest
@V. Melloy [quote=V.Melloy] And anyway it isnt most the time enough of a argument, to say a movie is bad cause his characters are unlikable. A lot of good movies have very unlikable characters and a distinct lag in relationships – cause thats not the way they work. [/quote] You’re right in that lots of good movies don’t have likable characters. However, we’re not talking about something like Clockwork Orange or American Psycho here. We’re talking about a pretty basic “guy fights to save girl” story. So here I think it’s critical to have likable people and a believable relationship… Read more »
Codysseus
Guest
If I hadn’t seen Scott Pilgrim beforehand, this review would have given me the impression that it’s a very serious movie. I’m not saying comedies don’t deserve in-depth analysis and criticism. It’s just that the ideas you seem to have the most problem with aren’t really the focus of the movie. I don’t think a strong emotional investment is necessary to enjoy it, and I’m not convinced that one was ever intended. The only sort of investment needed is a vague desire to want Scott to win. You thought Scott’s negative qualities far out-weighed his good ones, I guess. I… Read more »
V.Melloy
Guest
I cannot say, you failed in the goal to point out the lag of character and relation in this movie, but i don’t see why this is a bad thing. Scott Pilgrim isnt a “development novel” (is this the word? in german it is “Entwicklungsroman”) and I suppose it dont wanna be a “Wilhelm Meisters lehrjahre”. And anyway it isnt most the time enough of a argument, to say a movie is bad cause his characters are unlikable. A lot of good movies have very unlikable characters and a distinct lag in relationships – cause thats not the way they… Read more »
RandomRob
Guest

You lost me at the Jack Sparrow comment.

Anonymous
Guest
The thing about this review is that you’re right about a lot of things. Scott is a douche and Ramona is a shallow character without enough characterization to make the audience feel like she’s a goal with going after. HOWEVER, with that having been said, the movie is tremendously fun to watch, has a very very well written script, great acting from all the evil exes, great music, great special effects, and a great style that has never been seen on the big screen before. So your super condescending review about how mature and smart you are makes YOU sound… Read more »
Louis F.
Guest

You know what? I love this movie to death and truly admire its attempt to balance romantic concerns and flashy staging, but you actually convinced me that when it comes to providing a worthwhile “goal” to Pilgrim’s “quest”, it is quite lacking. I believe the idiosyncrasies more than make up for it and I don’t think it ruins the story half as much as you do, but I won’t even try to argue against it. I’m just glad we agree about Knives’ charming growth as a person.

From a long-time reader.

Mark
Guest

Fantastic bit of criticism, here. I was referred by Twitter and have also decided to retweet myself. Never heard of this site before now, but I will add it to my RSS feed. Good work. 🙂

Richard Naik
Guest

@Doctor Professor

I didn’t see Knives as having her epiphany about not needing Scott until after she fights Ramona, which makes sense since she still wants revenge for Ramona stealing Scott. After she learns the truth Knives realizes that the whole thing wasn’t worth so much heartache, and lets go of it.

That alt ending makes a lot more sense. I’m curious as to why they chose to change it.

Doctor Professor
Guest
It’s hard for me to be objective about this movie, since I read (and loved) the comics before it came out. The person I watched with hadn’t, and when she pointed out all the bits of shallow characterization I realized that in almost every case I had simply failed to notice because I had filled in with knowledge from the comics. That said, it was blindingly obvious even to me how unconvincing the Scott/Ramona relationship was. It was completely unearned in the film. Naturally much of this is better in the comics (there is a lot more depth, especially for… Read more »
ZippyDSMlee
Guest
It’s no worse than the Ateam,Push or Air bender(condition hell, it would make a better 1-3,1-6 film series). Like most alt fiction(comic book like sci fi or fantasy) its rushed. Tho at least the fiction itself is not pissed on like Xmen and most comic fiction. If anything its overly cliche and shallow kinda like most comic and or action films. Speaking of which Push was better. All in all I enjoyed it but it could have been much worse and somewhat better, I really have no hope left for good to great alt fiction films as the drugs consumed… Read more »
Richard Naik
Guest

@Dale

Yeah, exactly. The cornerstone of the whole movie is that Ramona is so perfect and wonderful that everyone she’s ever been with is driven mad with their desire to be with her.

Why? We never see what’s so special about her to inspire the kind of devotion it takes to form a cult around someone. She’s just kind of….there.

Dale Weir
Guest
Nice post Richard. Can’t say I agree with everything you wrote as I count myself as someone who really enjoyed the movie (up until the end). I do agree with everything you said about Ramona and Knives though. Scott Pilgrim fans might argue that the Ramona/Knives/Scott love triangle is better fleshed out in the comics/graphic novels leaving no doubt why the couple winds up together. And maybe that is the case. But as someone who didn’t read the comics and has no interest in doing so, I have to say that Scott Pilgrim vs the World’s writer failed at his… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest

I agree with a lot of your points. Including the one where I expected to enjoy it and didn’t.

The thing is, Ramona could have been replaced with a sack of rice and the movie would still have played out the same way. Scott loves the rice, the rice appears wholly uninterested and the rice’s exes come back to fight over the bag of rice.

wpDiscuz