GameCritics.com Forums

GameCritics.com Forums (http://www.gamecritics.com/forums/index.php)
-   Community User Submissions (http://www.gamecritics.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Please Rate This Review: Fallout 3 (http://www.gamecritics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15649)

RogueMovement 06-01-2009 05:00 AM

Please Rate This Review: Fallout 3
 
HIGH It's Oblivion... with guns!

LOW It's just - sigh - Oblivion with guns..

WTF How does putting on a lab coat make one better at science?

“The absence of death in most people’s early years creates a psychic vacuum of sorts. For many, thoughts of a nuclear confrontation are one’s first true brush with nonexistence, and because they are the first, they can be the most powerful and indelible.” The Wrong Sun, Douglas Coupland.

Nuclear Holocaust is never far from people’s minds. It is the fear to end all fear – that an advanced civilization might destroy itself through the marriage between science and ego; that a nightmare rain may fall that brings fire and ruin to the Earth, leaving behind nothing of mankind but rubble spattered with raytraced shadows of death. A scenario of such pure dread that people often wonder whether it would be better to die in the initial conflagration than survive and face the uncertain future of endless Nuclear Harvests. It is into this scorched cradle of a possible tomorrow that the protagonist of Bethesda’s Fallout 3 is born, at first consigned to a bunker (Vault 101) in the suburbs of Washington DC, but never destined to remain.

In the alternate history leading up to this event, the Cold War thawed into all-out conflict between the USA and China. The bombs fell. Humanity survived, but rather than starting over and building a utopia, it has sleepwalked into a world of lawless conflict, community clinging on in small clusters, attempting to recreate the forgotten dream of society, never far from a relapse into war. Whether the protagonist becomes a catalyst for collapse or a defender against it is undecided, and it is with this burden of freedom that the player must blink the sunlight out of his or her eyes as they leave the womb-like Vault 101 and set out to discover who they are.

Welcome to the Capital Wastelands, a world frozen in a futuristic vision of the 1950s, a charred photograph of the era of DC Comics, Beatniks, and the beginnings of the Civil Rights movement (mutated now into smooth skins versus ghouls), airbrushed with the technology that people those days dreamed of – from nuclear cars to household robots. It is a world steeped in cultural references and nuance. Indeed, each house in the wastelands still standing offers its own story – who were the inhabitants? How did they live? And how did they die? Corpses are to be found curled up in bathtubs, embracing in bed, or inches away from guaranteed survival in a shelter. The world is vast and open, with only the inner regions of what was Washington DC compartmentalised by debris, linked via subway systems. It would be challenging to see everything there is to see, and that is regardless of the existence of downloadable extras. This playfield is richer even than that portrayed by Bethesda in Oblivion, perhaps not as large, but far more impressive in its details and texture.

While publicizing this title, Bethesda distanced themselves from the idea that Fallout 3 was Oblivion with guns, which is funny because that is pretty much how it plays. There are many similarities between Fallout 3 and Oblivion: both offer an open ended world for the player to investigate in the style they see fit; there is a main quest for the player to accomplish, but it is more than possible to forget about that completely and lose oneself amongst the detritus; plus there is usually more than one way to accomplish a goal; Fallout 3 even offers enchanted clothing. On the other hand, of the few differences, a large one in Fallout is that skills are doled out from a central kitty, earned by various achievements, like discovering new places, whereas in Oblivion skills are honed through repeated practise (more realistic perhaps, but leading to ridiculous scenarios where it makes sense to jump up and down on the spot a hundred times to improve one’s acrobatics a little).

Another change is the introduction of the VATS targeting system, which breaks the action out of real time and allows enemies to be targeted in turn and shots queued up dependent upon a number of action points. It’s a nice idea, but the set-up rarely gives a reason to do anything but aim for the head. So rather than each encounter being a Halo-like cat and mouse struggle, it is more a race to freeze time, queue up shots, and sit back as the action plays out. While Fallout 3 was never meant to be all-out action, it seems mired somewhere in the middle between this and role playing: a player is not forced to use VATS at all, but not doing so is a weak option since shooting real time is a huge waste of ammo and highly inaccurate. It would be nice, too, if the stealth approach didn’t so often leave the protagonist forced to resort to fighting, not through their own mistakes, understand, but because of the design of the various buildings.

As with any imagined world, it is all too easy to see inconsistencies, and not just the obvious things like how come there is a weird mix of futuristic technology (lasers and robots) alongside 1950’s kitsch. It seems that the nuclear war is intended to have occurred years from now, yet how come computers never evolved beyond 1980s terminals? Other subtle things grate, too: in the Fallout 3 world itself people tend to know things as soon as they happen like magic. For instance, a karma system tracks whether a player is good or bad, which is fine, but it breaks the fourth wall when all the none-player characters know right away if the protagonist waltzed into someone’s house unseen and stole all of their pots and pans.

What hurts Fallout most, though, is what happens as the protagonist grows in their powers. Fallout 3 apes Oblivion in that when the protagonist increases in level so do all of the enemies in areas that have not yet been visited relevant to the main quest. There are pros and cons to this; mainly, it is a little weird - while the enemies are tweaked to balance the experience, locks and other skill-based checks have fixed values, and often the hardest to open doors and containers have little exciting inside when the player returns to them. Regardless it soon becomes more than possible to deal with any enemy - skills hit the ceiling far before the end if the player indulges in even a little side-questing, and it’s then that the VATS system particularly drags. Worse, with no factions to rise to the top of, unlike the guilds in Oblivion, the ultimate purpose of the game soon becomes the completion of the main quest and for reasons probably to do with the coding nightmare of scripting a fallen world back on the road to redemption, after the main quest’s completion everything just stops and that’s it. The end. It’s almost like a nuclear bomb went off. In fact, that would make a better resolution than what is offered here.

Presenting a compelling vision of an alternate future history, Fallout 3 is a memorable experience. That it cannot escape its own limitations is not surprising. Any attempt at a open-ended world without rules through the medium of a computer program, which must necessarily be steeped in rules, cannot work. This is perhaps no better illustrated by an inventive quest that occurs along the main plot line, and is allegorical to our own struggle as beings in this nuclear age: we as flawed creators cannot create that which is without flaw. So in conquering the atom we awaken new fears that mean we must constantly flinch and maybe wonder, albeit fleetingly, if Armageddon is upon us each time lightning crashes over a backdrop of international unrest. Fallout 3 is an imperfect yet important work in documenting humanity’s cultural history of fear and is highly recommended.

8/10

Brad Gallaway 06-02-2009 02:05 AM

Re: Please Rate This Review: Fallout 3
 
Thanks for posting, RM… an interesting take on an interesting game. My only feedback at the moment is that I think it might stand a little conservative trimming, but otherwise I was feeling it. Oh, don't forget to add the High/Low/WTF and the consumer advice at the end. Check any of the posted reviews for a guide. Nice work, and a green light from me.

Jason Karney 06-02-2009 08:18 AM

Re: Please Rate This Review: Fallout 3
 
Hi,

That was a very well written review. I haven't played Fallout 3, but reading this piece, I really get a feel for the dark view of the retro-50's milieu that the game is based upon.

Excellent grammar and vocabulary. The only thing I noticed is "...as the protagonist grows in their powers," which should be "his" powers.

I think you map out flaws nicely as well. I probably wouldn't reference general critiques of the game; you could remove that without hurting anything.

I'd approve this for publishing to our home page, with the same caveats that Brad suggests: a touch of trimming, plus the addition of High/Low/WTF and consumer advice per our style guide (see any published review for example). If you're interested, please make these updates and we can post it.

Keep on writin'!

Mike Bracken 06-02-2009 12:47 PM

Re: Please Rate This Review: Fallout 3
 
Wow, very good review. I'm with Brad in thinking you could trim it a little (oh, the irony of Bracken telling someone to trim a review...that could be one of the seven signs of the apocalypse.)

"While publicising this title, Bethesda distanced themselves from the idea that Fallout 3 was Oblivion with guns, which is funny because that is pretty much how it plays"

I just started playing the game, and I couldn't agree more. I'm actually sort of disappointed that the whole game to this point feels like a re-skinned Oblivion with guns...

"a large one in Fallout is that skills are dolled out from a central kitty"

I think you want "doled out" here and not "dolled".

There was one other thing I was going to point out, but I'll be damned if I can find it or remember what it was now...

Brad Gallaway 06-07-2009 12:29 PM

Re: Please Rate This Review: Fallout 3
 
What's the verdict, gentlemen? Green light?

Dale Weir 06-08-2009 04:30 AM

Re: Please Rate This Review: Fallout 3
 
It should be good to go, it's now got more than four "approvals from staff members".

dale

Jason Karney 06-08-2009 07:37 AM

Re: Please Rate This Review: Fallout 3
 
Looks ready, thanks for making those updates.

It still needs the consumer section added to post this review. Sorry I didn't catch that sooner.

ETA: got the consumer info via PM, so this review is all set.

Brad Gallaway 06-09-2009 12:23 AM

Re: Please Rate This Review: Fallout 3
 
Congrats, Rogue Movement. Good show. :D

Spokker 06-16-2009 01:15 AM

Re: Please Rate This Review: Fallout 3
 
Quote:

It seems that the nuclear war is intended to have occurred years from now, yet how come computers never evolved beyond 1980s terminals?
They explain it in the instruction manual.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2010 GameCritics.com. All rights reserved.