Gungrave: Overdose

Game Description: Want to be an unruly and undead gun-toter? A blind, foul-mouthed and prepetually angry swordsmen? How about a red-leather-wearing rock star armed with a lethal electric guitar? Choose your character and mode of attack wisely and let the destruction begin. Just make sure you show up rested. Because once the bodies start dropping, there's no turning back.

Gungrave: Overdose – Review

Normally, the reviews here at start with what I like to call a preamble—Chi and Dale like it when we find a theme or an idea that resonates outside of the gaming industry and tie it into the game review itself. However, sometimes one must just cut to the chase, and the chase here is that Gungrave: Overdose is a bad game. Oh, it's technically proficient—it won't crash or lock up a PlayStation 2—but it's so bland and uninspired that one has to wonder how it ever got released. At its worst, it's a vampire in CD form, sucking all the joy out of any gamer unfortunate enough to put it in their PS2. At best, it's a thinly veiled "commercial" for the anime series that spawned in the wake of the first title. What it is not, however, is fun.

I was pretty lenient with the first Gungrave game. It was a mindless shooter that went for aesthetics over substance, but it was beaten in a few hours—basically before it wore out its welcome. Gungrave: Overdose is more of the same. In fact, its biggest sin is arguably that it does nothing to expand on the first game in any meaningful way. The core gameplay is just as repetitive as it was the first time around, the controls still blow, and the game is actually a little uglier in terms of graphical presentation. The game's "innovations" are the inclusion of two new characters to play as (neither makes the game even remotely enjoyable) and a few new special attacks…that's it. The big selling point is that publisher Mastiff has released the game at an obscenely low $15 price point. Yet, even at $15 this game is a rip off.

Players take control of Grave, the returning undead main character of the first game. Grave follows the credo of "don't speak at all and carry two really big guns and a huge freaking coffin." He's a shoot first and ask questions never kind of guy—which is just what this game needs since there's not a single person to actually speak to in Gungrave: Overdose, nor is there ever anything onscreen that shouldn't be shot into a million tiny pieces as quickly as possible.

In this regard, Overdose is eerily reminiscent of the old 8-bit shooters—games like Contra, which put a single good guy up against nearly insurmountable odds. And had Gungrave: Overdose appeared on consoles roughly twenty years ago, it might have actually been fun. Unfortunately, the past two decades have seen gaming advance in innumerable ways, and the "shoot everything that moves" genre has grown. There are still third person shooters around, but in 2004 they need a little more nuance than just "shoot the hell out of everything on the screen" to appeal to today's gamer.

The original Gungrave, as mentioned earlier, was smart enough to realize that this style of game was one that would wear out its welcome in short order. As such, the game was beaten in roughly three hours the first time through, and even at the end of three hours it was getting tedious. For some odd reason, someone decided that Overdose—which features the exact same game mechanics—would be better served by being nearly twice as long as the original. If you thought Gungrave was getting tedious at the three hour mark, imagine just how much fun hour five is…six hours of mindlessly blasting bad guys and destroying everything on the screen (albeit with no background music other than the sound effects of my guns) had me questioning why I even play videogames. Games are supposed to be fun, and Overdose is the veritable antithesis of that.

The problem is that the game never changes. From the first stage to the last it's the same thing repeated over and over again. Characters may learn a few new demolition attacks as they advance, but it doesn't change anything in how players approach the game. This is a button masher of the first order, and even then, players will only be mashing two buttons over and over. There are no cool combos, no upgraded weaponry, no character advancement…nothing. It's all just walk and shoot.

One would think that when a game is as simple as walk and shoot that the developers could get the controls right. Unfortunately, the controls in this game are about as responsive as someone in a coma. Grave still lumbers along like a dumb lug, making trying to dodge any of the insane amounts of incoming fire absolutely pointless. He can still jump and dive, and just like the last time out, he'll dive when you want to jump and jump when you want to dive. Cheap death abounds as players advance and the controls become more of a hindrance than a help. And don't even get me started on the auto-targeting system—a system that makes the auto-targeting in Grand Theft Auto 3 look absolutely brilliant in comparison.

Overdose has a whopping total of two positives going for it: the anime cutscenes are still nice (which is to be expected since the game's spawned an anime series of its own) and the main theme of the game (which returns from the first title) still kicks butt. It's a shame that such a badass theme is wasted on such a mediocre title. Neither of these positives can outweigh the mindless button mashing, the crappy level design (one stage has players walking through a casino destroying slot machines armed with machine guns…another takes place in a grocery store…), bland graphics, and nonsensical story (I'll not even bother trying to explain that…).

It's been awhile since I've played a game this bad (Aquaman was the last one that left me this bitter), and while I'm certainly okay with suffering through stuff like this so others don't have to, I know someone out there is still gonna get suckered into picking this game up. "Oh, it's only $15—it can't be that bad" they'll think—but believe me, it is. Gungrave wasn't a good enough game to spawn a sequel, and this one is even less inspired than the first. Trust me, there are far better things to blow $15 on. Rating: 3 out of 10

Gungrave: Overdose – Second Opinion

Well, I certainly feel like a jackass. The first GunGrave was simple stuff, but it had a kind of low-rent charm. Its jazzy soundtrack hit all the right notes (how could you not like those blasting horns at the end of a level?), and it was amusing to send undead hero Grave into a bullet frenzy and see him spew hot lead over every inch of the screen. Besides, the cutscenes were honestly good enough to keep me playing until the end, despite the lack of pizzazz in the gameplay.

So where does the jackass part come in? I actually paid money for the sequel before seeing what Mike had to say. He was lucky in that he got the review copy and kept his green where it belonged—in his wallet.

Thinking that a sequel could only improve on what the first GunGrave offered, I figured that swiping my debit card for a small-scale budget release would be a two-fer; I'd not only be supporting an underdog publisher, but I'd also be supporting a studio that put out a not-bad original game and hopefully keep them going until they could move on to bigger and better things.

I want my money back.

The graphics are worse than the first game's (not that they were ever really that great to begin with), and the cutscenes have been pared down considerably. Instead of wall-to-wall animated action sequences, more often than not the game shoves talking-head / text-box tediousness onscreen and expects me to not fall asleep.

The level designs also look and feel worse than the original. Long drab hallways filled with pop-out, pop-up hordes of identical twin enemies are not what I'd call "entertaining," and every area felt longer than it needed to be—much like the game as a whole. I was looking at the to-play pile on top of my TV for something else before I'd even finished the third level.

There's just nothing else to say. GunGrave: Overdose does nothing that the first game didn't already do slightly better. It's also longer, looks worse, and feels less involving. It's a shallow effort with nothing to recommend it, and Mike's entirely right in saying that it's not worth the cash, even at the rock-bottom price it's likely at by now. If you absolutely need to play something low-cal with lots of bang, at least go for the first GunGrave or something else along the same lines. In the case of Overdose, you certainly get what you pay for—not a lot.Rating: 2 out of 10

Gungrave: Overdose – Consumer Guide

According to ESRB, this game contains: Blood, Violence

Parents will notice that Gungrave: Overdose sports a mature rating. It is a violent game that involves shooting literally everything on the screen—however, since there are no real characters in the game (everyone's the equivalent of a cardboard cutout in a shooting gallery) the violence doesn't really ever tie into the real world. The real reason you should keep little Timmy away from this game is because it's not fun.

Fans of the original can safely skip this one—it's the same thing with twice as much repetition. Adding two characters and a few new demolition shots may seem like advancements, but when the core gameplay is so simplistic and repetitive, you're going to have to do something a lot more profound than that to make the game seem worthwhile. Stick with the original.

Casual gamers will no doubt be lured in by the $15 price poin, and most of them will come to regret it. Cheap games are nice—at least when they're games worth playing.

Deaf and Hard of Hearing gamers can experience all the game's brilliant dialogue as it comes subtitled.